Gates Says SCO Case Will Harm Linux
Well, yeah, he would say that, wouldn't he. And he's not saying that because MSFT is definitely not the money behind the SCO suit. Totally not-related.
What I get annoyed with is the utter lack of comprehension by the people of MS of what, exactly, Free/Open Source means. Hell, they even use BSD netcode in their networking software, so MS knows that not all licenses are GPL. It's probably willful and all part of the grand FUD scheme, but it's not all willful, particularly when the FUD and misinfo is being vomitted up from the depths of the Microsoft non-dev's bellies (yeah, I'm talking about Gates, Ballmer, Allchin, et. al.).
Case in point (from article): "[Gates:] Here you have a product without R&D controls, and it's not part of a cross-license," he said. "Given the high level of functionality, you'd think it would have patents."
Moron. Patents are antithetical to the Free and Open movement. Moreover, if there were patents, your sorry ass couldn't be benefitting from the code.
Gates is brushed with the "he's smart because he's rich brush." Frankly, I think he's of moderate intelligence but as mean as any street brawler in any Cannery Row you can find.
He's still going lose, but he'll try every dirty, underhanded trick possible before he goes down.
Permalink |