Archive

Archive for the ‘Law’ Category

Culture of Corruption, Enron edition

May 25th, 2006 No comments

Another day, another batch of GOP felons.

Former Enron bosses Ken Lay and Jeffrey Skilling have both been found guilty on fraud, conspiracy and other charges.

In all, Skilling has been found guilty on 19 of the 28 counts he faced – with the “not guilty” verdicts coming on some of the charges of insider trading.

He could face as much as 185 years in jail.

Lay, however, has been found guilty of all six fraud and conspiracy charges that he faced. He could face as much as 45 years behind bars.

Categories: Awesome, Evil, Law, Money

The telcos are lying

May 17th, 2006 No comments

Or, it’s not a lie when Duhbya and John “death squad” Negroponte say you don’t have to tell the truth.

Ordinarily, a company that conceals their transactions and activities from the public would violate securities law. But an presidential memorandum signed by the President on May 5 allows the Director of National Intelligence, John Negroponte, to authorize a company to conceal activities related to national security. (See 15 U.S.C. 78m(b)(3)(A))

Though it’s not considered one of the signs of fascism, an obsession with secrecy is certainly a hallmark of a despotic government.

If the Executive issues an ad hoc presidential memorandum that authorizes corporations to violate laws passed by the Legislative, how are we not in the middle of Constitutional crisis right now?

Categories: Evil, Freedom, Law, Privacy

Response from WorkingAssets Wireless

May 15th, 2006 No comments

I asked them if they had complied with NSA requests to allow access to their phone records. This is there response.

Dear M. Moore:

Thank you for your email concerning your interest in the subject of warrantless monitoring of American citizens’ communications by the National Security Agency.

Working Assets has taken the following position on this subject:

Working Assets believes that the warrantless monitoring of phone conversations ordered by the Bush administration is both illegal and alarming.

We will pursue this issue through our citizen action program, and by supporting organizations committed to preserving civil liberties in America.

Working Assets has never been approached by any government agency seeking our help in illegally accessing the content of conversations by our customers, and we would refuse any such request.

We have information regarding the conduct of our underlying carrier (Sprint). For more information, please visit: http://www.workingforchange.com/webgraphics/nsa.html#blog

They can’t control Sprint, but WA will not release your records. Using the theory of doing what one can, a) use encryption (because this is email as well as phone), b) use a traffic obfuscator like Tor, and c) switch providers to one who will not comply with illegal Executive requests.

Verizon Wireless and T-Mobile say they did not share information. Verizon, the land line company, did. Cingular and Sprint declined to comment, which you can probably read as they have shared their information with the NSA.

Known involved companies at this point are entirely land line. VOIP, particularly encrypted VOIP, looks to be a great option. Not that it really matters, but you may want to avoid Skype, since I’m sure the NSA is applying the “they’re a European company, therefore every Skype packet is international and we can intercept it” card.

Categories: Freedom, Law

Rise up. Now.

May 15th, 2006 No comments

Welcome to your new police state, you know, the one without the free press. Who needs that First Amendment anyway? It just gets in the way of catching terrrrrrists.

A senior federal law enforcement official tells ABC News the government is tracking the phone numbers we (Brian Ross and Richard Esposito) call in an effort to root out confidential sources.

“It’s time for you to get some new cell phones, quick,” the source told us in an in-person conversation.

ABC News does not know how the government determined who we are calling, or whether our phone records were provided to the government as part of the recently-disclosed NSA collection of domestic phone calls.

Other sources have told us that phone calls and contacts by reporters for ABC News, along with the New York Times and the Washington Post, are being examined as part of a widespread CIA leak investigation.

Looks like time to add another notch to points 3 and 6 of the defining steps of fascism to me. Probably 13 as well.

Categories: Evil, Freedom, Grrr..., Law

Ohpleaseohpleaseohplease

May 14th, 2006 No comments

Karl Rove Indicted on Charges of Perjury, Lying to Investigators

Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald spent more than half a day Friday at the offices of Patton Boggs, the law firm representing Karl Rove.

During the course of that meeting, Fitzgerald served attorneys for former Deputy White House Chief of Staff Karl Rove with an indictment charging the embattled White House official with perjury and lying to investigators related to his role in the CIA leak case, and instructed one of the attorneys to tell Rove that he has 24 hours to get his affairs in order, high level sources with direct knowledge of the meeting said Saturday morning.

frog march, bitch

Update: looks like Jason Leopold is not the most trustworthy of sources, so grains of salt. As it has now been two full business days in the week since this report came out, let’s just say it’s veracity is in doubt. For my part, I think it highly likely that Rove will be indicted in the near future. There are very few other possible explanations for Fitzgerald’s actions.

Categories: Evil, Law, News, Yay!

Authoritarian police state pt. 2

May 11th, 2006 No comments

What do you do if you’re a part of a secret police force outside the law when the Law comes a knockin’? Why, you deny them the security clearance the need to investigate your actions, of course!

Categories: Evil, Eye Rollers, Freedom, Law

Authoritarian police state

May 11th, 2006 No comments

What would you say about a country with an unaccountable, secret police force? A secret police force that spies on its own citizens – all of them – under the guise of “searching for terrorists”? A police force unburdened by the Rule of Law in its own country. A police force that uses financial coercion and physical intimidation in order to bully non-State actors into complying with their (illegal, if the Rule of Law is in effect) activities. A police force that is answerable only to the Executive, and an Executive who does not feel the Rule of Law applies to him at that? Is it the KGB? Is it the Gestapo? The whatever it is the Chinese are using these days?

Possibly. But it’s also certainly our own NSA.

In addition, the agency suggested that Qwest’s foot-dragging might affect its ability to get future classified work with the government. Like other big telecommunications companies, Qwest already had classified contracts and hoped to get more.

Unable to get comfortable with what NSA was proposing, Qwest’s lawyers asked NSA to take its proposal to the FISA court. According to the sources, the agency refused.

The NSA’s explanation did little to satisfy Qwest’s lawyers. “They told (Qwest) they didn’t want to do that because FISA might not agree with them,” one person recalled. For similar reasons, this person said, NSA rejected Qwest’s suggestion of getting a letter of authorization from the U.S. attorney general’s office. A second person confirmed this version of events.

So, kudos to Qwest, for being the only telecomm to refuse to comply with the NSA’s illegal requests absent a court order. If you can switch, by all means do so. Or better still, Working Assets, the only telecommunications company to sign on with the ACLU to stop the illegal wiretapping of US Citizens.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but what the NSA is doing is collecting an immense database of the behaviors and activities of American citizens. Without a warrant. Without probable cause. Outside of the law. This is a shadowy group that even the CIA lifers think are right wing. A group completely amoral, devoted to black ops, and in favor of authoritarianism at every step of the way.

If anyone imagines for even one second that the data the NSA is collecting here is not going to be used or already used for such things as domestic spying, intimidation of protest groups, disruption of reporters who may be investigating actions embarassing to the administration, exposing whistleblowers and the like, then I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

Remember, at first they said they didn’t spy. Then they said they spied only with court approval. Then they said they spied only on international calls, not your calls to your girlfriend or your parents or your fellow little league coaches. And now, they’re spying on we domestic citizens. Outside of the Rule of Law, with no legal authority outside of an authoritarian state.

At each new revelation, the 101st Fighting Keyboarders said if you didn’t like what was happening, you loved the terrorists. At each step, they gave tortured justifications or credulously believed the administrations patently absurd legal justifications. At each step, these cowardly bedwetters begged for the paternalistic administration to come tuck them in and save them from the bad people. Well, now they’ve met the bad people, and the bad people wear US Government ID cards.

See also, Greenwald, Glenn. Side note: I can see Glenn’s point that the Constitutional and legal issues aren’t exactly bright lines here (primarily resting on privacy grounds, as in lack thereof in PEN registers), but I think the burden is upon the administration to prove the legality of monitoring citizen activities, using coercion against businesses, and essentialing Taking corporate assets for government use. I should point out that, legally speaking, I think the Constitutional issues are probably non-starters, but that statutory issues are almost ironclad in prohibiting the NSA’s actions here. I’ll try to remember to look up the USC sections later.

Further questions I have:
1) internet – are they tracking our browsing/usage behavior? Are they capturing emails? For those of you not already using encryption such as PGP or GnuPG, ferchrissake, what the hell are you waiting for? For those of you not using Tor, what are you waiting for?

2) VOIP too? If yes to internet, then yes to VOIP.

This may not be the America that I knew, but going forward anyone who contacts me should be under the assumption that the communication is monitored and possibly able to be read if in text format.

… Unless you use encryption. Which is both useful and necessary for our privacy. It’s also super easy to use and install. I’m tired of trying to get people to use encryption. You may be forcing my hand here, but by FSM, I’m going to start encrypting everything I send and if the recipients can’t figure it out… tough. My public key is linked to at the bottom of every page on this site. GnuPG + enigmail (two plugins for Thunderbird). All of this is Open and Free. Learn it, live it, love it.

Tor is the other leg to the encryption side. If your packets aren’t encrypted, they can read them. If they are, they can still do packet analysis to see where you are going. Tor eliminates the packet analysis leg. Use it. If you have spare bandwidth, please donate that as well.

Remember the right wing saying how if guns are outlawed, then only outlaws will have guns? Well, if my government suspects me of being a criminal, then only my government is suspect.

Update: the telcos could be liable for many billions in damages (see also: ACSBlog). Now, who wants to be the first attorney to form a class for a Class Action?

Categories: Evil, Freedom, Law, Misc, Privacy

FSM does not love me that much

April 20th, 2006 No comments

Grand Jury Hears Evidence Against Rove

The grand jury session in federal court in Washington, DC, sources close to the case said, was the first time this year that Fitzgerald told the jurors that he would soon present them with a list of criminal charges he intends to file against Rove in hopes of having the grand jury return a multi-count indictment against Rove.

In an interview Wednesday, Rove’s attorney, Robert Luskin, confirmed that Rove remains a “subject” of Fitzgerald’s two-year-old probe.

“Mr. Rove is still a subject of the investigation,” Luskin said. In a previous interview, Luskin asserted that Rove would not be indicted by Fitzgerald, but he was unwilling to make that prediction again Wednesday.

pleaseohpleaseohplease bring me a Rove under my Fitzmas tree

Categories: Law

This is how democracy ends

April 9th, 2006 No comments

not with a bang, but with a whimper. As the media and corporate interests collude to hand over the citizenry’s fundamental rights to the government (even though the media and the corporations are composed of the People, the decisionmakers are not of the People). The latest: AT&T forwards all Internet traffic into NSA

“The evidence that we are filing supports our claim that AT&T is diverting Internet traffic into the hands of the NSA wholesale, in violation of federal wiretapping laws and the Fourth Amendment,” said EFF Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston.

“More than just threatening individuals’ privacy, AT&T’s apparent choice to give the government secret, direct access to millions of ordinary Americans’ Internet communications is a threat to the Constitution itself. We are asking the Court to put a stop to it now,” said Bankston.

Easy Fourth Amendment violation right there. Well, it was a violation until the busheviks took over and smilin Sammy scAlito was mortared into place using the hooves of the traitorous Dem sellouts, that is.

You know, when my back’s against the wall, I’ll think on all of the quislings and cowards that let us inch into this situation. Then I’ll track them down in whatever afterlife they’ve chosen and kick ‘im in the nether regions.

Also, in case it’s not too late, you can still join the EFF and the ACLU (the ACLU has a companion case going against the NSA). Oh, and if you aren’t using Tor, you should be.

Categories: Evil, Freedom, Law, Privacy

It’s Scalia’s world, we just live in it

March 27th, 2006 No comments

He flipped the bird – while in church! – to his critics.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia startled reporters in Boston just minutes after attending a mass, by flipping a middle finger to his critics.

A Boston Herald reporter asked the 70-year-old conservative Roman Catholic if he faces much questioning over impartiality when it comes to issues separating church and state.

“You know what I say to those people?” Scalia replied, making the obscene gesture and explaining “That’s Sicilian.”

The 20-year veteran of the high court was caught making the gesture by a photographer with The Pilot, the Archdiocese of Boston’s newspaper.

This comes on the heels of his speech regarding the rights of prisoners at Guantanimo (for which he must recuse himself from a couple upcoming cases. Think that’s likely?), of course.

Some say Scalia is losing it. I think Scalia’s feeling his oats. He’s created this world with the bullshit Bush v. Gore 2000 decision and now he’s letting his disdain for the people and love of authority show. Wow, what a great time to be an American.

Update: it wasn’t the bird as American’s know it, it was the chin flip while saying “va fangul”. Same diff.

Categories: Evil, Freedom, Law

Immigrants are people too

March 26th, 2006 No comments

Given the GOP’s nationalist, jingoist, reactionary, racist proposed bill this week that would make helping an 80 year old across the street illegal if she were an undocumented alien. This unamerican, unchristian, inhuman bill is one of the biggest disgraces of our recent congressional history.

Well, the immigrants and libs heard about it too.

Joining what some are calling the nation’s largest mobilization of immigrants ever, hundreds of thousands of people boisterously marched in downtown Los Angeles Saturday to protest federal legislation that would crack down on undocumented immigrants, penalize those who help them and build a security wall on the U.S. southern border. Spirited crowds representing labor, religious groups, civil-rights advocates and ordinary immigrants stretched over 26 blocks of downtown Los Angeles from Adams Blvd. along Spring Street and Broadway to City Hall, tooting kazoos, waving American flags and chanting “Si se puede!” (Yes we can!). The crowd, estimated by police at more than 500.000, represented one of the largest protest marches in Los Angeles history, surpassing Vietnam War demonstrations and the 70,000 who rallied downtown against Proposition 187, a 1994 state initiative that denied public benefits to undocumented migrants.

Given our gilded age, I’m sure this will have as much effect as the worldwide demonstrations against the Iraq invasion. Don’t these GOoPers know who provides all the essential services they rely upon? They cook their meals, they drive the ambulances. They connect our calls. They guard us while we sleep. Do not… fuck with them.

Categories: Freedom, Idiots, Law, Politics, Yay!

The end of democracy in America

March 25th, 2006 No comments

200 years as a nation, and it only took the Busheviks 5 years to destroy our Constitution. Aided and abetted by a complacent Congress and a sycophantic, approving media.

Bush has been illegally adding caveats to Congressional laws – and we know it’s illegal because the Supreme Court has already ruled on the line-item veto, and adding a rider that “the preznit will not pay attention to this” is no different. The Bush administration has decided that the Executive has all the powers of the Legislative and Judicial. If this isn’t precisely what Madison warned against in the Federalist paper 47, then I’m a monkey’s uncle.

The reality is that the Administration has been making clear for quite some time that they have unlimited power and that nothing — not even the law — can restrict it. But here, they are specifically telling Congress that even if Congress amends FISA and the President agrees to abide by those amendments, they still have the power to break the law whenever they want. As I have documented more times than I can count, we have a President who has seized unlimited power, including the power to break the law, and the Administration — somewhat commendably — is quite candid and straightforward about that fact.

Greenwald’s noting this again is nothing new, of course. In some ways we have the frog boiling problem (where the actions are too slow to realize the danger until it’s too late). In others we have people who are unable to comprehend just how audacious and authoritarian this government is; I think Krugman was the first to mainstream the radical nature of this government. Maybe it was Alterman. In any event, absent a real opposition party, the reemergence of an independent media, the spontaneous development of a spine, moral compass, and integrity in the GOP Congress, our country as we once knew (and mythologized) it is dead.

Categories: Evil, Freedom, Law

Who needs the separation clause, anyway?

March 23rd, 2006 No comments

Certainly not Arkansas

Teachers at his facility are forbidden to use the “e-word” (evolution)
with the kids. They are permitted to use the word “adaptation” but only to refer to a current characteristic of an organism, not as a product of evolutionary change via natural selection. They cannot even use the term “natural selection.”

Bob’s personal issue was more specific, and the prohibition more insidious. In his words, “I am instructed NOT to use hard numbers when telling kids how old rocks are. I am supposed to say that these rocks are VERY VERY OLD … but I am NOT to say that these rocks are thought to be about 300 million years old.”

Should’ve thought of that in 2000, Sandy

March 16th, 2006 No comments

Sandra Day O’Connor says US risks edging near to dictatorship

Sandra Day O’Connor, a Republican-appointed judge who retired last month after 24 years on the supreme court, has said the US is in danger of edging towards dictatorship if the party’s rightwingers continue to attack the judiciary.

In a strongly worded speech at Georgetown University, reported by National Public Radio and the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Ms O’Connor took aim at Republican leaders whose repeated denunciations of the courts for alleged liberal bias could, she said, be contributing to a climate of violence against judges.

And yet she went against established law and her own avowed federalism to put monkey boy into office in 2000. This, after hitting the DC cocktail party circuit and saying you would retire the next term if a Republican were elected president. You have a point, lady, but you had your chance to stem this tide and you threw it away for partisanship. O’Connor helped create that which she now decries, and for that she receives zeor sympathy from me.

Categories: Evil, Eye Rollers, Freedom, Grrr..., Law

Fundies taking over my state

March 14th, 2006 No comments

and they’re drumming up a fake crisis over Plan B and pharmacists refusing to perform their State-licensed fiduciary duty.

Getting a prescription filled is pretty straight-forward. Take the doctor’s slip into the pharmacy and get the medication.

But some pharmacists are stepping up and saying they won’t fill prescriptions on moral grounds.

The debate centers around the so-called morning after pill, or Plan B.

Here’s the thing, you do your job or you lose your license. In my world, that is. And I want to know if any pharmacist in any shithole little town where he is the only option refuses to dispense Plan B medication because I will represent, pro bono, the woman who is so harmed.

I’m truly tired of these hollow moral melodramas, whipped out of whole cloth and ignorance, all over (and signifying) nothing. The media aids and abets the mouthbreathing fucktards who appear to have quit maturing at the “if I close my eyes, the bad thoughts will go away” stage, because adrenaline sells ad space and eyeballs. While I’m sure the Okanogan county Rep will “consider” this as law, it’s not a real crisis… though at this point in the Decline and Fall, I don’t think it really matters which specific “crisis” acts as the inevitable “cause” of the destruction of this Union.

So, whatever.

I am serious about representing people who have been denied medication by pharmacists who feel they have the right to impose their own sharia over the secular laws of our State, though. No, really. Pharmacists make high-fives to low six-figures on average, so neither they nor their corporate sponsors who purport to have an independent contractor relationship with them are immune from the harm they cause.

Of course, all of this sturm und drang could have been avoided if the FDA had not been turned into a political arm of the Dobsons of the world and, despite the FDA’s own repeated recommendations, sold Plan B over the counter as was initially planned…

Categories: Evil, Eye Rollers, Grrr..., Law